In which I am gratuitously cheeky yet again
A few months ago Dan Vorhaus asked me to contribute a brief commentary to his and his colleagues’ fantastic blog, The Genomics Law Report. The admittedly modest fruits of my labor are now up.
Dear Dr. Board-Certified Clinical Geneticist:
First of all, thank you! Sure, you could have bailed after pediatrics or internal medicine and made more money, but you chose to stick around for a couple more years, incur still more debt, and make less. Much less! (Fortunately, you are a doctor and not a financial adviser.) And a fine doctor you are, schooled in the ancient art of dysmorphology, which is probably as inscrutable to your molecular-fetishist colleagues as exon-capture protocols are to you.
It is meant to be light and to both poke a bit of fun at and sympathize with medical geneticists. I thank David Dimmock for helpful feedback, though all of the blame lies squarely with me.
For a more responsible take, please read Hank Greely’s commentary.
I work as an Assistant Professor in the Duke University Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy (although this site and its content are my own).
In 2007 I became the fourth subject in Harvard geneticist George Church's Personal Genome Project. As the PGP moves forward, I am chronicling the dawn of personal genomics, that is, people obtaining their genomic information for whatever reason(s) and figuring out what to do with it. I am interested in the relevant technologies and especially the attendant privacy and other ethical/legal/social issues.
This blog may also discuss some of my non-genome interests or, to paraphrase Dwight Yoakam, "Guitars, Cadillacs, hillbilly music, etc etc."
The header image comes from the Liz Lerman Dance Exchange's multimedia performance piece, "Ferocious Beauty: Genome."